Sharp as a Marble
HomeAboutContactSyndicationLogin
 

I've been battling with something for a while now. I really, really, really want to remove the R from my voter's registration card. I'm not a Republican, at least not in the sense of how the  GOP sees themselves. To me, the only difference between Democrats and Republicans these days are basically defense issues. Neither party stands for smaller government, neither respects your right of liberty. The Republicans want to create laws that restrict which orifice your purple helmeted love warrior can invade and the Democrats want to create laws that force you to eat organically grown tofu and require that your children wear helmets when walking on any hard surface.

I guess the reason I've stuck with Republicans is because their perfidies usually are things I'm not totally against. I'm a social conservative who doesn't think you have to be a social conservative. So when stupid conservative laws are passed, they generally don't affect me. When lefty laws are passed, such as increased minimum wage laws, those bother me more because I am against them (as a business owner myself, if I have to increase what I pay my employees, I increase my prices to compensate which then causes inflation which then negates the effect of increasing minimum wage).

I'm probably better labeled a libertarian with a dose of reality (Neolibertarian). But since full blown Libertarians are generally nutjobs who are more interested in legalizing tar heroin than reeling in the Government's reach, I've not paid them much attention and realized that generally, I'll vote more for Republicans. I vote Democrat too, but usually only locally because I feel that Dems tend to have a better feel for their own. So I've kept my R title so that I can affect the candidate selection of the GOP since they're more closely aligned to my views.

This whole Terri Schiavo case has pushed me over the edge. I'm filing out my little card and going independent. While I feel sorry for Terri and her parents, having congress get involved is the stupidest thing I've seen in years. Laurence Simon says it best:

  • The party that wants to defend the sanctitity of marriage refuses to acknowledge it when a woman entrusts her wishes to her husband.
  • The party that wants government out of people's lives just convened an emergency session of Congress to butt into one woman's life.
  • The party that most rails against "activist judges" has just reset the process for the parents to ask the judicial system to review and re-review this case yet again until they get the results they want.
  • The party that says that thirteen years of UN Sanctions are not a rush to war thinks that seven years of constant court battles is a rush to let someone die.
  • Sissy Willis, of course, understands perfectly when she comments

     Whatever side of the aisle, they're politicians, silly.

    I realize that, but it's just annoying. Time for me to completely disassociate myself with what's left of the GOP and become a free agent. Maybe it won't matter in the Whole Sort of General Mish-Mash, but I don't want to be associated with them anymore.

    rolled out on Thursday, March 24, 2005 8:54 AM
    Comments
    # Losing My (R)eligion - Dummocrats.com

    Rolled Out On: 3/24/2005 9:51 AM

    Losing My (R)eligion

    # RE: Losing My (R)eligion - Emily

    Rolled Out On: 3/24/2005 1:43 PM

    The only reason I think this can be seen as a political issue is the fact that it's been in court so long, has become a major factor in the news recently, and a ruling either way will set a precedent in the courts concerning the legality of euthanasia (or mercy-killing, or whatever you want to call it) of disabled persons. It has become a cast that represents not only the life of one woman, but of all disabled people (thanks to the media, blogosphere, etc), and That is one of the big reasons why many of these politicians have stuck their noses in it. I think, had the media, etc., not made such a big deal about it, the government wouldn't have messed with it; but when they were asked by hundreds of thousands to respond to this, they made a decision under pressure. I don't really think this has much to do with the fact that they're either "republican" or "democrat" or whatever. The people and the media put pressure on them, and they responded.

    # RE: Losing My (R)eligion - Slarrow

    Rolled Out On: 3/24/2005 2:10 PM

    Filling out your new independent card is one thing. When the chips are down, though, how will you actually vote? Would you actually vote for a Democratic candidate with the wrong ideas on national security if the Republican candidate had "culture of life" in all the boilerplate speeches? Will you trust that the stakes are low enough on the vital issues that you can happily stay out of the game?

    Jonah Goldberg reacts to Instapundit's question on The Corner, suggesting that the intellectual contradictions won't actually be reflected in the popular vote. (That plays into a private belief of mine that the libertarian element is overrepresented in the conservative blogosphere, but that's another issue.) I think he may be right because I think the aspects that cause people to self-identify as a particular status aren't the exact same elements that influence people's votes.

    I wish you luck in your new independent status (although the points Laurence Simon makes don't persuade me in the slightest; I don't think they're accurate). I'm just curious how much it will actually change your behavior.

    # RE: Losing My (R)eligion - Robb Allen

    Rolled Out On: 3/24/2005 2:59 PM

    Slarrow - Even as a registered Republican, I have never voted party lines. I've voted plenty of Democrats and even a few Independents (never a Libertarian because they've always been kookie).

    Would you vote for a Republican who promised to fight the war on terror but also said he'd fight for censoring movies on the big screen, push for tax breaks for church members, and reinstating prohibition? I wouldn't, as those issues will affect me harder and faster than the threat of terrorism does. I'm not saying that the WoT isn't important, but it's not the only thing.

    The democrats are not as soft as the right would have you believe. I think the Gephardts and Liebermans are underrepresented in the DNC. While I'll disagree with the higher taxes, if the Dems can afford me more freedom than the GOP and fight the WoT, then yes I will vote for them.

    But your last point is the most salient. You're absolutely right - My voting behavior will not change, but that's because for me, it's always been about who's the best candidate and not about party. I just won't have an R by my name.

    # My Kind of Republican - Dummocrats

    Rolled Out On: 3/24/2005 11:10 PM

    I've been predicting the coming split in the Republican Party for nearly a year now. I'm not the only one. Today alone, Sharp As A Marble said: I've been battling with something for a while now. I really, really, really...

    # RE: Losing My (R)eligion - Sphaeron

    Rolled Out On: 3/25/2005 11:08 AM

    While I have generally found myself agreeing more with the Democratic point of view (I'm progressive by nature) I like to think that I'll never have a D or an R next to my name. I think the day that I decide to "side up" with anyone is the day that I stop thinking clearly and open-mindedly about the "other side's" thoughts and objectives. Probably not a lot.. but at least a little.

    Welcome to my party -- or the lack thereof. Where clear thinking, rational debate, and your own damn opinion are what really matter. :)


    # RE: Losing My (R)eligion - Slarrow

    Rolled Out On: 3/25/2005 11:58 AM

    "Would you vote for a Republican who promised to fight the war on terror but also said he'd fight for censoring movies on the big screen, push for tax breaks for church members, and reinstating prohibition?"

    Yes, I would, based on this analysis. First, what's he running for? If it's fairly low-level (municipal, for example), he actually might have the leverage to change things in a very restricted area...but it also means that I have better opportunity to influence/oppose him on specific issues (letters to the editor, local politicking, etc.). From there, the further up the chain you go, the scope of his pet issues' reach grows as my influence as a regular guy diminishes.

    But his power to push through his pet issues correspondingly diminishes as he needs support from other diverse elements. Thus, it is easier for him to get stuff done on the major items I wanted him to (war on terror, in this case) than the quirkier stuff. In addition, if I hold my nose and send him just because he has an (R) after his name and he helps there be more (R)s than (D)s, I'm more likely to get the things done that I really like than I am to see the things I really don't like get passed. To my mind, that's worth the risk of seeing things I merely don't like getting passed as I would trust the system (i.e., timidity and self-preservation instincts of other weaselly politicians) to act as a check on those issues.

    It sure ain't perfect, and the calculation falls apart if you think there actually is enough widespread support for the issues you don't like to pass so that it's not just your candidate. But those are the standard dangers anyway.

    Of course, enough of this kind of calculation over the years lets a party drift away from its initial winning strategies, and then the great realignment comes. But I don't expect that for at least another 15 years.

    # RE: Losing My (R)eligion - 11rb13

    Rolled Out On: 3/29/2005 5:42 PM

    This is just another way for the Religious extremist to shove their beliefs down my Liberal Left throat.

    # RE: Losing My (R)eligion - Sissy Willis

    Rolled Out On: 3/24/2005 9:10 AM

    I know how you feel, 'cause I feel the same way, but before you leap, be sure to check out Glenn Reynolds & links on the subject -- you may have already, but in case not, start here: http://instapundit.com/archives/021991.php -- says Glenn:


    CONSERVATIVE CRACKUP: Is the Republican coalition about to splinter? I examine the question over at GlennReynolds.com.

    # RE: Losing My (R)eligion - Sissy Willis

    Rolled Out On: 3/24/2005 9:11 AM

    And thanks for the nice link. :)

    Comments have been closed on this topic.
     
    TipJar
    2A Blogger Bash
    Wanna Chat?
    Click here!
    Other bloggers with guns.

    News

    Recently upgraded to Subtext 2.0.

    Article Categories


    General

    Archives


    August, 2008 (58)
    July, 2008 (93)
    June, 2008 (77)
    May, 2008 (79)
    April, 2008 (53)
    March, 2008 (46)
    February, 2008 (46)
    January, 2008 (63)
    December, 2007 (69)
    November, 2007 (63)
    October, 2007 (83)
    September, 2007 (73)
    August, 2007 (84)
    July, 2007 (59)
    June, 2007 (63)
    May, 2007 (35)
    April, 2007 (30)
    March, 2007 (37)
    February, 2007 (32)
    January, 2007 (38)
    December, 2006 (14)
    November, 2006 (28)
    October, 2006 (25)
    September, 2006 (24)
    August, 2006 (28)
    July, 2006 (27)
    June, 2006 (28)
    May, 2006 (14)
    April, 2006 (17)
    March, 2006 (35)
    February, 2006 (33)
    January, 2006 (26)
    December, 2005 (15)
    November, 2005 (22)
    October, 2005 (35)
    September, 2005 (37)
    August, 2005 (50)
    July, 2005 (34)
    June, 2005 (55)
    May, 2005 (53)
    April, 2005 (56)
    March, 2005 (57)
    February, 2005 (77)
    January, 2005 (72)
    December, 2004 (79)
    November, 2004 (76)
    October, 2004 (59)
    September, 2004 (74)
    August, 2004 (69)
    July, 2004 (75)
    June, 2004 (56)
    May, 2004 (28)

    Post Categories


    Humor (rss)
    Views (rss)
    Catblogging (rss)
    News (rss)
    Politics (rss)
    Geekdom (rss)
    Recipes (rss)
    Blogging (rss)
    Wingnuts and Moonbats (rss)
    War on Terror (rss)
    Photography (rss)
    Brewsky (rss)
    Guns. Lots of Guns. (rss)
    Daughter Blogging (rss)
    TMI (rss)
    Anxiety & Panic Attacks (rss)
    Gun Myths (rss)
    Reloading (rss)
    Range Time (rss)
    Anti-Rights Idiocy (rss)
    Firearm Safety (rss)
    A Cancer Story (rss)
    Second Amendment Blog Bash (rss)
    Gun Rights (rss)
    Gun-Free Zones (rss)
    Self Defense (rss)
    The Line Is Here (rss)
    Getting old sucks (rss)
    NRA (rss)
    2A Blog Bash (rss)
    Out of sight, out of mind (rss)
    Video Podcasts (rss)
    Para Blackwater Training (rss)

    Image Galleries


    Beyond the Pale brewing session

    ::Other Digs


    The Line Is Here

    ::Sharpest Marbles


    Eject! Eject! Eject!
    Instapundit
    Iraq the Model
    Protein Wisdom
    QandO
    Sharp as a Marble
    Vodka Pundit
    WILLisms
    Witting Shire
    Wizbang

    :Second Amendment


    A Keyboard and a .45
    Alphecca
    Anthroblogogy
    Armed and Safe
    Call Me Ahab
    Carnaby Fudge
    Days of our Trailers
    Double Tapper
    Dustin's Gun Blog
    Fighting for Liberty
    Great Blue Whale
    Gun Owners Against Violence
    Gun Pundit
    Guntards
    Justin Buist
    Mike-istan
    Musings of the Geek with a 45
    Oleg Volk
    Papa Delta Bravo
    Pro-Gun Progressive
    Random Nuclear Strikes
    Ride Fast and Shoot Straight
    Roberta X
    Say Uncle
    Sear and Hammer
    Snowflakes in Hell
    The Anarchangel
    The Bitch Girls
    The Breda Fallacy
    The Countertop Chronicles
    The Law Dog Files
    The Liberty Sphere
    The Mad Rocket Scientist
    The Madman Raves
    The Other Side of Kim
    The Sentinel
    The Smallest Minority
    The View From North Central Idaho
    The War on Guns
    View from the porch
    West, By God
    Xavier thoughts

    Blogroll


    Guide to Midwestern Culture
    Basil's Blog
    Captain's Quarters
    Coalition of the Swilling
    Cold Fury
    Cranky Neocon
    Daily Pundit
    dorkafork
    File It Under
    Florida Cracker
    Garfield Ridge
    INDC Journal
    Is Full Of Crap
    Medium at Large
    Notes from the trenches
    One Ping Only
    Sean Gleeson
    Sekimori
    Sissy Willis
    Six Meat Buffet
    Speed of thought
    Squeaky Wheel Seeks Grease
    The Belmont Club
    The Munchkin Wrangler
    The Spoons Experience
    The Unforgiving Minute
    Tim Worstall
    UNSpace
    Vern's Blog

    Extended Blogroll


    21st Century Paladin
    Bill Peschel
    Cowboy Blob
    Craziness
    Flight Pundit
    Hubs and Spokes
    In the Right
    PEER Review
    TechnoChitlins
    The Tygrrrr Express

    Funny, as in Ha-ha


    Ace of Spades HQ
    Cox & Forkum
    IMAO
    ScrappleFace
    The Superficial
    Topic Drift
    Wuzzadem

    Good Reads


    Drink This
    Evil White Guy
    Leaning to the Right
    Ramble Strip
    Save the Soldiers
    SondraK
    The Resplendent Mango
    Triticale
    You Big Mouth You

    Tampa Area Blogs


    Tampa Film Fan

    My Technorati Conversations

    Hang in there Mom

    Cool Post-it Note Icon