If gun free zones make our children safer, then why do politicians have protection details?
Advertisement
Comments
Crotalus says:
on 12/31/2012 at 2:11 PM
Because politicians are so very (self) important people. Children are expendable for the Agenda.
In principle, it's a good idea. In practice, it may not be. If one of them were end up injured by a projectile they would all call for more "sensible gun legislation"...
TS
TS
Eck!
says:
Yep then we'll have a projectile free zone, a no name calling zone, and no filing zone. They will still do as they have done.
What was the line again, "let them eat cake".
Eck!
What was the line again, "let them eat cake".
Eck!
Gun Shy Tourist
says:
The bottom line, is that these elitists are scared to death of the 'little people' owning defensive weapons. The bottom line? No guns for you...protection details (paid for by you) for them:
http://aroundotown.blogspot.com/2010/06/thou-scaredy-cat-hypocrite.html
http://aroundotown.blogspot.com/2010/06/thou-scaredy-cat-hypocrite.html
I don't disagree with anyone's arguments. I was trying to make mine without anyone being able to turn my words into a suggestion for (gun) violence against politicians. They'll have theirs but they do not want us to have ours.
TS
TS
Comments have been closed on this topic.

