And since when is shooting 3 people a mass shooting?
During his testimony Wednesday, Thandiwe suggested that his reason for even purchasing the gun he used in the shootings was to enforce beliefs he’d developed about white people during his later years as an anthropology major at the University of West Georgia.
…
He said the night before the shooting, he attended a so-called “Peace Party” intended to address his concerns about helping the black community find equal footing, but two white people were there.
And that’s what set him off.
I’m surprised he didn’t spontaneously combust from the irony.
Advertisement
Comments
I've been hearing all about "hate crime" for years. The one thing I've never been able to understand is:
- Two white guys beat a black guy to death == "hate crime"
- Two black guys beat a white guy to death != "hate crime"
On that same vein:
- Two straight guys beat a gay guy to death == "hate crime"
- Two gay guys beat a straight guy to death != "hate crime"
I'd like to propose (though it will never go anywhere in the politically correct world we reside in) that we either do away with "hate crime" laws, or charge all murders and most assaults under them. Most people don't shoot/stab/strangle/beat/etc other people because they "just love them soooo much".
- Two white guys beat a black guy to death == "hate crime"
- Two black guys beat a white guy to death != "hate crime"
On that same vein:
- Two straight guys beat a gay guy to death == "hate crime"
- Two gay guys beat a straight guy to death != "hate crime"
I'd like to propose (though it will never go anywhere in the politically correct world we reside in) that we either do away with "hate crime" laws, or charge all murders and most assaults under them. Most people don't shoot/stab/strangle/beat/etc other people because they "just love them soooo much".
One could argue that, based on his choice of targets, he also hated women. I wonder if Lifetime is negotiating the movie rights to the story yet.
Frankly, him being an anthropology major, believing what he believed,and then doing what he did: makes me ashamed that I'm an anthropologist.
Ken
says:
Adding to the points made by Archer and TigerStripe above: They're also a manifestation and implementation of the Rule of Man (as opposed to the rule of law).
Robb's right. Your shame in being an anthropologist should be based on having studied anthropology, not a relativistic shame based on who else is an anthropologist.
Nothing wrong with anthropology -- so long as it's between consenting adults in the privacy of their own homes.
Comments have been closed on this topic.


It's because of people like this that I don't like to go out in public unarmed.
s