Or is this a facepalm moment?

The anti’s truly believe that, had guns not been allowed in National Parks, the shooting in Mt. Rainier would not have happened. You see, crazy people do not care about taking human lives nor are they concerned with any punishment for their actions, unless of course that punishment revolves around getting busted for carrying a gun. Then they’re all like “Whoa! The death penalty for murder I can deal with, but 5 extra years for carrying a gun across an imaginary line? I can’t live with that on my conscious!

It’s a fallacy that the anti’s repeat so many times it’s become a religious edict – Gun nuts oppose any gun law because they want crazy people to have firearms. We all know this isn’t true. I oppose most gun laws because people who aren’t going to follow the laws regarding murder, robbery, and assault are not going to be deterred by some sort of procedural issue about how and where they carried a particular type of firearm.

If you believe laws against carrying a firearm in a National Park would have prevented this tragedy, you’re delusional. Crazy people are crazy. Criminals aren’t going to follow the laws to begin with. The only people who are affected by such nonsense are those who are never going to be a problem anyway.

posted @ 1/3/2012 9:51:01 AM
Robb Allen proves himself to be the Jeremy Clarkson of firearms - The Truth About Guns
One of the premier blogs on naked iguanas - Guns Holsters & Gear
If there is another blog out there with more suspiciously sourced quotes, I don't know what it is. - Thomas Jefferson
TipJar

Guns Up

Florida Carry

Shot Group Analyzer
Dead Goblin Count
Dead Goblin Count
Social Networks

Archives

Select Year:
Blogroll
*Bloggers I've personally met

Second Amendment

Sharpest Marbles

Blogroll

Funny, as in Ha-ha

Good Reads

Extended Blogroll

Industry Links