Sharp as a Marble - For people with very large hands

<< Not much use installing an extra set of doors on the barn | Home | More reasons to love the Gunshine state >>

Anti-Rights Idiocy

The NY Times poops out another misinformed, rhetoric laden, fact free diatribe and that in and of itself is nothing special. However, this little gem gave me a chuckle.

That's a hell of a hand gun

I don’t think Uncle Mikes makes a pocket holster for that model, unfortunately.

Hat Tip Bob Owens, who takes the article to task.

posted @ 12/2/2011 12:07:48 PM

Incoming Links

SayUncle » Layers of editorial oversight on 12/2/2011 1:33:46 PM

Comments

Bob Owens says:

on 12/2/2011 12:09:43 PM

I still think I could get that in the carry pocket of my Sig jacket. That thing is HUGE.

Rob Crawford says:

on 12/2/2011 12:38:38 PM

Ya gotta use yer hands to shoot it, right?!

Braden Lynch says:

on 12/2/2011 3:55:36 PM

It's also a "handgun" in the sense that you need TWO hands to hold the thing.

Timmeehh says:

on 12/2/2011 4:02:17 PM

The hand in "hand guns" went down the memory hole.

John Hardin says:

on 12/2/2011 4:29:38 PM

Yeah. "Layers of Editorial Oversight."

Here's one I noticed a few months back during the Great California Open Carry Panic...

Speakertweaker says:

on 12/2/2011 4:53:10 PM

WTF are you talking about? I deep conceal two of those at a time, and practice restlessly to dual-wield them.

If you wore pants, you would know that.

Geez.

tweaker

Crotalus says:

on 12/2/2011 6:23:27 PM

Then maybe it should be a "handsgun" Braden. :-D

As far as the NY Slime is concerned, "Screw the facts! The Agenda is what's important!"

Shootin' Buddy says:

on 12/3/2011 11:19:23 AM

Perhaps they meant "handgonnes"???

Skip says:

on 12/4/2011 2:12:13 AM

Uhhh, my inseam isen't long enough.

Comments have been closed on this topic.