Sharp as a Marble - Some of these people mean to do you harm

<< Social Cons attempt to ban ‘rave’ music in California | Home | Look at my last post, now look back to this one >>

Some of these people mean to do you harm

Anti-Rights Idiocy , Guns. Lots of Guns. , I Fear My Government , Papers Please , Politics , Self Defense , Wingnuts and Moonbats , Wookie Suits

Miguel over at Gun Free Zone has a twitter conversation with one of the Occupy Wall Street goons. What said goon tells him is nothing short than chilling

-@anarcosocialist You guys want to tax “the rich” 90% of what they make. So what happens when “the rich” stop generating revenue?
-@GunFreeZone the vast majority will fall in line the others will be forced to keep working. its very simple
-@anarcosocialist what do you mean they can’t? How are you gonna force them if they don’t want to?
-@GunFreeZone they can’t refuse, its very simple
-@GunFreeZone to get a truly peaceful and just society you must be wiling to #breaksomeeggs i do not shy away from this
-@GunFreeZone it might be painful for the first generation but their kids will fall in line in a hurry. it is the only way
-@GunFreeZone #breaksomeeggs that is all im wiling to say

Emphasis mine. What this cretin is saying is that those who do not follow his vision of utopia will be murdered and that their children and others will fall in line under the threat of death.

In order to achieve a socialist paradise of ‘peace’ you must kill as many people as it takes. Load them up in box cars, put them in the ‘showers’ if need be, but you must kill them because their inability to conform to the sheep mentality is a threat to the system and they must be destroyed.

Here's the big difference between us Wookie Suiters and these thugs – In my utopia, they can exist without threatening anything. They are free to voluntarily group together in a commune, share everything they have amongst themselves, sit around all day smoking stale tofu, screwing each other until their eyes bleed, I don’t care. They could parade around the cities with signs and leaflets (printed on organically grown and sustainable hemp paper with biodegradable soy inks!) extolling the virtues of communal life, give speeches about the benefits of bimonthly baths and dreadlock-armpit hair and while I would ridicule and dismiss them, they would be free to do so without the fear of any entity using force to make them behave otherwise.

They cannot do the same. A socialist hellhole requires everyone to buy into the system. Individuals, even just a handful, will dismantle everything. Thus, their ‘peaceful’ society is based on the outright murder of anyone who doesn’t conform. That’s not peace nor has it ever been about peace. It’s all about controlling others.

Now, this particular simpleton does not represent the entire OWS movement. I know a few people who are all about it who wouldn’t lift a feather against another human in anger. What they fail to realize though is that there are entire swaths of people who would. There are people who will kill you for not believing in their god, for failing to use recycled toilet paper or incandescent light bulbs, or for not conforming to their vision of ‘peaceful’.

This is why I am armed to the teeth. This imbecile fails to realize that those he thinks he can put against the wall will not just saunter up to their fate. We have guns. Lots of them, and we will defend ourselves from these people if need be. The fact that he cannot conceive of people fighting back and thinks that all he has to do is shoot a few bankers and the whole world will bend to his will tells a lot about how little we have to fear people like him as individuals.

As a group, there is more to worry about. Many politicians and race-hustlers are leaning toward ignoring the will of the people. Speak up against it and you might find yourself at the wrong end of a predator drone (of course, now they’ll just strip you of citizenship first to avoid the whole ‘assassinating American citizens’ label).

One would hope that we, as a society, would have learned about how this all ends by now. However, with idiots like this anarcosocialist openly spouting such drivel (from the safety of his capitalist built home on a capitalist computer going across capitalist interweb tubes), it is clear that the threat of tyranny is never fully gone.

Stay well regulated, my friends.

(Irony upon irony, Pandora was playing In the Flesh by Pink Floyd while I wrote this)

posted @ 10/14/2011 8:49:24 AM

Incoming Links

SayUncle » Some idiotologies are so committed they will force you to comply on 10/14/2011 9:07:56 AM

Break Some Eggs on 10/15/2011 9:01:36 AM

Why having an Anointed Class Doesn't Work. | The Minuteman on 10/16/2011 10:35:24 AM

Comments

Jay G. says:

on 10/14/2011 10:00:24 AM

Unless and until they are *personally* willing to come to your house and force you to conform, they're nothing more than cowards.

They're perfectly happy to use the power of the state to force you to do their bidding, but actually get out on the frontlines? Oh hell no. Getting hands dirty is for someone *else*.

It strikes me that they're a lot like the imams that urge their followers to blow themselves to Kingdom Come in the name of Allah - promising 72 virgins along the way - yet never manage to strap on the semtex underoos themselves...

Nylarthotep says:

on 10/14/2011 10:12:42 AM

Not really unexpected. No doubt this type of gathering was going to attract the new Che. I'll make it simple, kick in my door, I DARE you.

Bubblehead Les says:

on 10/14/2011 10:27:17 AM

Oh. PLEASE come and try to break MY Eggs!

thedawg says:

on 10/14/2011 10:35:52 AM

Ya know, one silly knucklehead doesn't speak for a whole group of people. Don't forget that the tea party had quite a few members who used eliminationist rhetoric as well...

Stretch says:

on 10/14/2011 10:39:11 AM

Some may think I have bayonets on my rifles just to keep Jay happy. Not so!
They come in very handy in case e's generally shammin' when 'e's dead.
Got to make sure the buggers say down.

Be interesting to see what GunFreeZone does when confronted with a 17" blade at the end of a an '03.

Rob Crawford says:

on 10/14/2011 10:40:50 AM

You're missing a point I've seen these types make multiple times:

the others will be forced to keep working

They want to impose slavery.

thedawg -- those supposed Tea Partiers weren't given podiums and loudspeakers. They weren't -- as we're learning from BigGovernment's latest scoop -- planning violence as an integral part of the "protest".

The "OWS" is made up of clowns and barbarians -- and it's the barbarians who are in charge of it.

Jack says:

on 10/14/2011 10:44:29 AM

Ahem:

"Now, this particular simpleton does not represent the entire OWS movement. I know a few people who are all about it who wouldn’t lift a feather against another human in anger."

Speaking about said simpleton. Note that he is advocating multigenerational class-bassed slavery.

You don't want to work so hard? Too bad.
Your buisness goes belly up? Too bad.

If you fall into the class of "rich" there is an ammount you, and your children, will have to pay, no matter how much you acutally make.

If you fail... well some eggs will have to be broken.

Nice to see that a "truly peaceful and just society" requires human bondage to keep itself funded.

Miguel says:

on 10/14/2011 10:45:17 AM

Be interesting to see what GunFreeZone does when confronted with a 17" blade at the end of a an '03.

Er... Stretch.. GunFreeZone is me. I am not the anarchoIdiot. That is the way Twitter works. "@gunfreezone" mean 'message directed at gunfreezone'

And just in case I am very allergic to any time of blade aimed at my direction... I break in hives, sweat, cry like a little girl, etc. :)

Robb Allen says:

on 10/14/2011 10:51:28 AM

Miguel, it's the slow blades you have to watch out for. They penetrate the shield!

Wolfman says:

on 10/14/2011 10:54:33 AM

I have been expecting these responses from the first time I heard of this movement. Its not likely the tofu hippies that think this, but eventually the thing will need to be better organized, and that means bringing in the 'intellectual' support. I expect the movement to gradually shift focus until there are none but likes of 'anarcosocialist' left, and the original members do not recognize their movement at all. Things are more dangerous now...

comatus says:

on 10/14/2011 10:58:17 AM

Stretch, since no one said "huh?" I'll presume you're not the only Kipling scholar here. But don't you give the current crop of fuzzies way too much credit? Show me a square they've broken. Soiled, maybe. I'd go with this one:

Just send in your chief and surrender
It's worse if you fights or you runs:
You may hide in the caves,
They'll only be your graves,
but you can't get away from the guns.

Stuart the Viking says:

on 10/14/2011 11:02:42 AM

"you must be wiling to #breaksomeeggs i do not shy away from this"

I'm your huckleberry asshole.

s

Xman says:

on 10/14/2011 11:16:33 AM

@treedawg: "Don't forget that the tea party had quite a few members who used eliminationist rhetoric as well...""Quite a few"...my muscular buttocks. Turds like that, on the rare occasions that they showed up at TEA rallies were routinely and loudly discredited by the overwhelmingly sane majority in the crowd. I've seen it with my own eyes. it would do you well to NOT fall for the characterizations of the TP by the left and the MSM (but I repeat myself). They have an agenda and they'll do and say literally anything to see it through - up and beyond recruiting undercover lefties to attend rallies with offensive signs, etc.

@Robb: "I know a few people who are all about it who wouldn’t lift a feather against another human in anger."

...thereby adding their silent, tacit approval for their more violent comrades' words and potential actions.

"Anarchosocialist"? Um...okay then. Dude needs a dictionary.

Stmarks says:

on 10/14/2011 11:21:45 AM

Based on history, and the 100 million deaths under communist party of china, and 25% depopulation of Cambodia by pol pot, I am taking their threats 100% seriously. They'll never be able to murder without facing resistance in the USA.

Wolfman says:

on 10/14/2011 11:31:22 AM

The fuzzy wuzzies demanded the respect of Kipling for their ferocity, and I don't think that's the battle here. The problem is that many people WILL 'fall n line,' if history serves as any indicator.
For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Chuck him out, the brute!"
But it's "Saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot;
An' it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' anything you please;
An' Tommy ain't a bloomin' fool -- you bet that Tommy sees!

DirtCrashr says:

on 10/14/2011 11:42:39 AM

It seems that in the 21st Century where we now are, the 2nd Amendment isn't just about protecting the freedom of the Citizenry from Government tyranny so much as about protecting the Citizenry from Govt. proxies - as praised by Pelosi and given a nod-and-a-wink by Obama hisself.
These thug-minded #OWS looters and creeps are the people's army he envisioned and talked about.

Robb Allen says:

on 10/14/2011 12:38:10 PM

DirtCrasher, we're a Republic to assist in avoiding the tyranny of the masses as well.

aeronathan says:

on 10/14/2011 1:29:27 PM

Nothing belt fed can't take care of handily...

Matt says:

on 10/14/2011 1:49:34 PM

Stay well regulated indeed. Need to hit the backyard range tomorrow.

harleycowboy says:

on 10/14/2011 2:23:33 PM

Go rent "The Killing Fields" to see his vision in action.

Ken Rihanek says:

on 10/14/2011 2:58:54 PM

Socialism expects the productive to remain productive. The top of the curve needs to create prosperity for the bottom of the curve. In Capitalism this works because productive people are rewarded. The Socialists remove the reward. Now why bust your ass if there's nothing to gain? Socialism pulls us all down to the bottom.

Robb Allen says:

on 10/14/2011 3:05:19 PM

And in this case, it pulls the productive into the grave.

Which is ironic in its own way - Those who *can* produce get killed off, scaring those who also could produce to ensure they don't act like they can so they're not up against the wall, ending your supply of producers.

Kaerius says:

on 10/14/2011 3:22:48 PM

Yes Robb, I guess that's where the slavery comes into play.

Joe in PNG says:

on 10/14/2011 5:04:52 PM

History is so very unkind to the Marxist with a pure heart. Every single time the "Revolution" comes about...
1) It gets hijacked by the ambitious and powerful...
2)...who then pretty much loot their countries to line their own pockets...
3)...while marching the Pure Hearted Marxist into the gulags as "counterrevolutionary influences".

Basically, with Marx, the Powerful get rich, the Poor get to line up for toilet paper, and the Marxist gets the sent to the camps.

deadcenter says:

on 10/14/2011 9:05:56 PM

Their vision pretty much requires slavery. Look at their living wage guarantee, 20 bucks/hour or whatever it happens to work out to. Who will willingly get off the couch or leave home if the payoff is to have 90% of your earnings used to pay those that sit and expect their entitlement?

The capable will be visibly disappeared until enough have been removed to act as incentive to those that remain. As has been pointed out, this was the standard for the communists.

What I find funny is that most of these people that 'think' like anarcosocialist, laugh at the tea party because the tea partiers see prescience in Atlas Shrugged.

mariner says:

on 10/14/2011 10:18:07 PM

"Miguel, it's the slow blades you have to watch out for. They penetrate the shield!"

Dune reader?

Skip says:

on 10/15/2011 2:38:33 AM

Reloading here Boss.

Seerak says:

on 10/15/2011 2:58:41 AM

Congratulations. You have discovered the true distinction between socialism and capitalism:

If the individual decides for himself, he is morally sovereign = capitalism. If the soviety decides for the individual, who must submit = socialism/fascism/collectivism.

Keep drilling down, and you'll discover that capitalism IS liberty (and convrsely, socialism is necessarily tyrannical), and that there is no distinction between economic and political liberty. Liberty is Indivisible -- individual rights do not cease to exist when a dollar is involved or when some bureaucrat deems an action "economic" (or "interstate", for that matter).

Seerak says:

on 10/15/2011 3:20:54 AM

Joe in PNG: when the inventor of a perpetual motion machine says that his machine failed because his design went bad and he needs to try again until he gets it right -- do you invest in his next attempt

Or do you properly recognize that his device fails because it is **wrong in principle**, i.e. It violates the laws of thermodynamics?

Communism fails because it is wrong in principle (specifically, the one I just described in my previous comment). Do not feed us this utter bullshit that "the revolution was betrayed", that the Soviet Union was not "true" communism, that actual Marxism doesn't require dictatorship and mass murder because Marx tacked on that fig leaf about "the state withering away" or any other such variant of that fucking "communism is good in theory" claptrap.

The "pure hearted Marxist" is a mass murderer. Regardless of his alleged intentions, his ideas lead to mass death, and (and ALL of his apologists) is morally responsible for knowing -- or evading -- that logical end-of-road.

100 million dead is more than enough to blow your horsehockey out of the water. I SAY ENOUGH. NOT ONE MORE.

ANYONE passing off that crap accepts the blood of 100 million+ on their hands.

How many more bodies will it take before that nonsense finally gathers the universal condemnation it deserves?

Joe in PNG says:

on 10/15/2011 3:35:46 AM

NOTE: I am NOT a Marxist. Period. Commie theory is pure bullshit- so please do me the courtesy of not lumping me with those dreadlocked idiots.

However, I was making an observation about one of the ironies of history- that the True Beleivers tend to wind up in the Gulags- and them that throw them in tend to not really care a flip about "the Revolution"... other than the fact it gives them Power, money, influence, ect.

That the Pure Marxist will happily send their neighbors off to be murdered in a camp is very sadly historically true- but more often it's the Pure Marxist that will be first against the wall... and will be applauding the State the whole time.

DirtCrashr says:

on 10/17/2011 1:40:22 PM

As that goober, the wannabee Pol-Pot calling himself anarchosocialist displays his ignorance, he claims to have multiple degrees - guess who gets eliminated first?
But sheer hubris and self-esteem clouds his vision and his mind - as it does for every Socialist who claims to speak for everyone - it's an insane, monstrous, Ego that drives it.

Comments have been closed on this topic.