A lesbian couple who caused a commotion recently when they refused to conceal their orientation while at Mesker Park Zoo & Botanic Garden were within their rights to do so, but law enforcement and a gay-rights expert questioned why they chose not to conceal their sexuality when asked. … Kajmowicz questioned the women’s motives to display their sexual orientation in an area where children were present, including his own. "They felt like (it was) their right to display it like that. It is not illegal for two members of the same sex to show affection that way and I don't want it to come across that it is, but when you are making that many people uncomfortable I don't know what purpose you are serving," Kajmowicz said.
A lesbian couple who caused a commotion recently when they refused to conceal their orientation while at Mesker Park Zoo & Botanic Garden were within their rights to do so, but law enforcement and a gay-rights expert questioned why they chose not to conceal their sexuality when asked.
…
Kajmowicz questioned the women’s motives to display their sexual orientation in an area where children were present, including his own.
"They felt like (it was) their right to display it like that. It is not illegal for two members of the same sex to show affection that way and I don't want it to come across that it is, but when you are making that many people uncomfortable I don't know what purpose you are serving," Kajmowicz said.
Boils your blood, doesn’t it?
Oh, but that’s not really the story. The real story is about open carry
A man who caused a commotion recently when he refused to conceal his handgun while at Mesker Park Zoo & Botanic Garden was within his rights to do so, but law enforcement and a gun-rights expert questioned why he chose not to conceal the weapon when asked. … Kajmowicz questioned the man's motives to display a weapon in an area where children were present, including his own. "He felt like (it was) his right to carry it like that. It is not illegal to carry it that way and I don't want it to come across that it is, but when you are making that many people uncomfortable I don't know what purpose you are serving," Kajmowicz said.
A man who caused a commotion recently when he refused to conceal his handgun while at Mesker Park Zoo & Botanic Garden was within his rights to do so, but law enforcement and a gun-rights expert questioned why he chose not to conceal the weapon when asked.
Kajmowicz questioned the man's motives to display a weapon in an area where children were present, including his own.
"He felt like (it was) his right to carry it like that. It is not illegal to carry it that way and I don't want it to come across that it is, but when you are making that many people uncomfortable I don't know what purpose you are serving," Kajmowicz said.
Why is it that when the story is read in its original context, squishy ‘gun rights supporters’ take this exact same tact against Open Carry?