Sharp as a Marble - It’s *just* like that

<< What we need are tighter controls on machetes | Home | Yes, sometimes people just snap >>

It’s *just* like that

Anti-Rights Idiocy

Japete let loose another howler today

But now, how is it possible to know who is legally carrying and who is not? How are police officers to know the difference? This is a ridiculous self fulfilling prophecy and an excuse to kill.

That sounds like a great movie!

Coming soon to blood drenched theaters near you!

posted @ 3/1/2011 12:38:32 PM

Comments

JP says:

on 3/1/2011 12:44:28 PM

Nice! That is awesome.

1911Man says:

on 3/1/2011 1:21:31 PM

The rifling even has a left-hand twist. Nice touch.

One of the things that scares me the most about the Lefties (including those who are personal friends) is that they appear entirely incapable of recognizing when one of their own is a complete moron.

You NEVER hear "I agree with some of what she says, but MAN that Rachel Maddow is a lunatic." Just ONCE I'd like to hear "Joanne, SHUT THE HELL UP! You're an ignorant buffoon, and you're damaging our cause." Until then, I give 'em ZERO credibility, the whole pack. Including personal friends.

Laughingdog says:

on 3/1/2011 1:30:05 PM

I just love japete's logic. Let's see, criminals in Florida are carrying concealed, and people with Concealed Handgun Permits are carrying concealed in Florida already. The police already can't tell which people that don't appear to have a firearm are criminals and which are not.

With legal open-carry, I would expect the same result in Florida as you have in Virginia. Law-abiding citizens carrying openly, and criminals continuing to carry concealed to avoid drawing any more attention to themselves than necessary.

mike w. says:

on 3/1/2011 1:41:03 PM

Wait?!, so the fact that people can now carry without a permit means they have an "excuse to kill."

I never knew I had an excuse to kill folks when I walked out of the house with a Sig on my hip!

BTW, I have NEVER heard of a single instance of violent crime occurring where the criminal(s) in question were open carrying holstered firearms. If it were an issue I am damn sure the MSM would cover it with rampant hysteria.

Miguel says:

on 3/1/2011 1:46:51 PM

Robb:
How can you read her blog without developing a massive migraine?
You are one brave hombre!

Pyrotek85 says:

on 3/1/2011 2:23:13 PM

Why the fark do cops need know in the first place? How about they arrest people based on what they're doing, not what objects are in their possession. I hardly knew what to comment on in that article.

Linoge says:

on 3/1/2011 9:30:54 PM

"Presumption of innocence" means nothing to that woman, does it? Then again, "reality" means nothing to that woman, so I guess it follows...

And how the hell does she go from "the police officer cannot be sure if that person is carrying legally" to "ZOMG SOMEONE IS GOING TO DIE!!!!!111!!" Whatever drugs that woman is on, she either needs to quit them, or double them...

J T Bolt says:

on 3/2/2011 7:42:15 AM

Yesh, of courshe Mish MonayPennay. It ish an excushe. If by 'kill' you mean 'shedushe you.'

By the way, the name'sh Thunderbolt. New Jovian Thunderbolt.

BwaWap BWA-WAAAAAAAAAAAA!!

Dave Sohm says:

on 3/2/2011 12:46:36 PM

How do the cops know who is legally armed? Well it doesn't really matter unless there is an active shooter incident, right? Then the good guys will comply with police commands, the bad guys will try to shoot the police.

Open carry? Easy. How many gangsters walk around with their pistol in a holster in plain view? They don't, because a gangster with a gun in the open will most definitely result in contact with the cops. She is willfully distorting facts, I mean you think someone who has thought about this subject so much would have thought these scenarios through.

Comments have been closed on this topic.

Comments

Archives

Categories

Comments

Archives

Categories

Second Amendment

Sharpest Marbles

Blogroll

Funny, as in Ha-ha

Good Reads

Extended Blogroll

Industry Links