Sile, over at The Gun Blogs, opines

It really PAINS me to find myself leaning towards agreement with the state of New York in anything, much less when it comes to banning of firearms. New York is considering a ban on "brightly painted guns", you know, the bright reds, blues, and worst in my opinion, orange. I'm not a guy who believes that the looks of a firearm should be a factor in determination use, but at the same time, I work in the law enforcement area and know that a orange gun (if they do become more prevailant) will cause either a officer to hesitate when he/she shouldn't or to not hesitate when they should. Either way, it's a screwed up situation. I can understand those who wish to personalize their property, I get it, but can we justify giving the drive-by media and the statistically challenged anti-gunners ammunition of a tragedy waiting to happen and we didn't "nip it in the bud" sort of speak? If I'm way off base please tell me. I just don't see it as a big deal.

I have to respectfully disagree here. I understand the hesitation to give the enemies of free people any ammunition to use, but the minute we cave in to something as ridiculous as banning certain colors of guns we've handed them more than they could ever ask for.

There are several reasons why this shouldn't even be an issue

What are "acceptable colors"?

Some people like chrome. I've seen horrific things done to Desert Eagles utilizing 24k gold. Camo green and sand is popular. I've even seem some nice blue colors. How "green" is too green? How do you define the exact shades that are legal and illegal?

Many toys already look like real guns.

Rip the bright orange tip off an airsoft, and from even just a few feet away, you won't be able to tell. This is important because if toys can be made to look real, there is no added threat from real guns that look like toys.

Only law abiding people would be affected.

I can't believe I have to go through this, but seriously. Let's say you ban pink and all law abiding citizens comply. A thug with a can of pink Krylon would paint his pistol anyway if he wanted. Only now, because the cops "feel" safer knowing that law abiding citizens don't have toy-looking guns, they will react even slower when faced with the criminal and his "toy looking gun".

How do you enforce this?

If you ban "Labial Pink", how can you tell the difference when someone paints theirs "Pink Pony Power"? You can't say "pink" because that's often in the eye of the beholder (I have a hard time with blues looking like purple).  Will cops have to carry around special optical equipment that measures luminosity and hue of weapons? And, no matter how well you craft the laws, people who don't like being dictated to will just find other ways to get around it.

Law enforcement is naturally a dangerous job.

You can't make their jobs safer by making laws. Those who have no respect for the law won't follow it anyway and they're the ones cops are going after in the first place. All you would do by banning colors is having cops target people who aren't a threat to public safety anyway.

My solution? You do nothing and take advice from colorblind cops. How do they handle seeing a firearm? They can't tell what color it is, so they go by shape. If it looks like a gun and it's being used in a threatening manner they react accordingly. All cops should do the same because the only reason guns are in the colors they are now are because it really hasn't been a money making business model to do otherwise.

Now it is.

Sorry, my freedom shouldn't be limited simply because some crook who wouldn't follow the law in the first place might do something.

What do you think?

posted @ 3/28/2008 2:03:02 PM
TipJar
Dead Goblin Count
Dead Goblin Count
Other bloggers with guns.
Social Networks

Archives

Select Year:
Blogroll
*Bloggers I've personally met

Second Amendment

Sharpest Marbles

Blogroll

Funny, as in Ha-ha

Good Reads

Extended Blogroll

Industry Links

Hang in there Mom